The House Was Not Hungry Then

2025

Action / Horror

3
IMDb Rating 3.6/10 10 110 110

haunted house pov (point of view) thoughtful gentle indie

Plot summary

While searching for her estranged father, a young woman breaks into an empty house in the countryside where every visitor disappears. Now she must avoid the man posing as a real estate agent who lures victims inside.

Director

Harry Aspinwall Photo
Harry Aspinwall

Top cast

Bill Paterson Photo
Bill Paterson as Dad
Bobby Rainsbury Photo
Bobby Rainsbury as Girl
Clive Russell Photo
Clive Russell as Estate Agent
Charlie O'Brien Photo
Charlie O'Brien as Young Father
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
853.29 MB
1280*692
English 2.0
NR
24 fps
1 hr 32 min
Seeds 6
1.55 GB
1920*1038
English 2.0
NR
24 fps
1 hr 32 min
Seeds 19

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by crystalclearmovies 3 / 10

Horrible one of the most boring all time.

At first the quick disappearance is intriguing but after an hour of nothing to go another 30 minutes of tedious scene after scene I swear you'll be yelling in your mind when the hell is this going to end. It's just super slow and pointless. The acting wals hard to judge because I think they were decent actors but to make that movie work just wasn't a possibility due to the plot and direction given to the actors. I think thats why I land on three because the cinematography and thw placements of the camera angles were not bad actually I think it helped the film tremendously but overall that story told in that way was weak.
Reviewed by paul_haakonsen 1 / 10

Oh dear God...

While I had never heard about this 2025 horror movie titled "The House Was Not Hungry Then" from writer and director Harry Aspinwall, as I stumbled upon it by random chance, of course I opted to watch it on account of it being a horror movie that I hadn't already seen. And I am a big fan of all things horror.The movie was devoid of an interesting storyline, and was running on what might have been a script consisting of a single handwritten page. Talk about a pointless and boring story. I have no idea how writer and director Harry Aspinwall seriously could muster to conjure up something so bland and irrelevant, and even more impressively managing to put it on film.As for "The House Was Not Hungry Then" being a horror movie, no. Just no. There was nothing scary about this movie, unless you consider how utterly pointless and the level of rubbish that passed for being a movie as horror, well then, by all means, then you're in for quite a treat, because "The House Was Not Hungry Then" was a waste of 92 minutes of film.I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie, and I can't claim that I found the acting performances to be particularly impressive. But then again, the actors and actresses virtually had nothing to work with in terms of script, storyline and character gallery.A lot of the movie was spent looking at empty shots of rooms or hallways in the house, with people walking past the windows or standing outside the windows and having conversation. But the problem was that the sound was so low that you couldn't hear anything but muffled mumbling. And truth be told, looking at shots of empty rooms or hallways just doesn't count as being proper entertainment for me.Do yourself a huge favor and stay well clear of the atrocity that is "The House Was Not Hungry Then". Some of us literally suffered through 92 minutes of pure Hellish torment by sitting through the dumpster fire that is "The House Was Not Hungry Then". We did it so you don't have to; you're quite welcome.But hey, if you think looking at strangely angled shots of empty rooms and hallways as being entertaining, then you're in for a stellar 92 minutes, should you opt to watch writer and director Harry Aspinwall's 2025 movie "The House Was Not Hungry Then".My rating of writer and director Harry Aspinwall's 2025 horror movie "The House Was Not Hungry Then" lands on a generous one out of ten stars.
Reviewed by effectraven 1 / 10

Static Wide Shots of Emptiness

I randomly stabled upon this film in my recommendations and Tittle drew me in "The House Was Not Hungry Then" as I think most people who decided to watch, but this film is lacking to say the least. It feels like this was a Short Film probably 10-15min. Max that was constructed into a full feature, because this film dragged on, I was at the 30min. Mark, and wondering to myself this is abit torturous. I know its a artistic choice to shoot wide in room and hallways and commit to it throughout, but when the film lacks story and depth and its so long, you start to wonder were these choices made out of laziness.
Read more IMDb reviews

2 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment