Stewart

2022

Action / Biography / Documentary / Sport

2
IMDb Rating 7.4/10 10 274 274

Plot summary

Stewart follows Jackie Stewart's rise from humble beginnings outside Glasgow, through the dark years of the early 1970s when Stewart, despite opposition, tried to improve safety at the races.

Director

Top cast

François Cevert as (archive footage)
Jochen Rindt as (archive footage)
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
833.07 MB
1280*694
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles dk  us  et  fi  lv  lt  nl  no  pl  sv  
25 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 1
1.67 GB
1920*1040
English 5.1
NR
Subtitles dk  us  et  fi  lv  lt  nl  no  pl  sv  
25 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by conradb 5 / 10

Fine - But annoying commentary and music

Stewart is an interesting subject - I'm a fan of him and the sport, but I found this documentary fairly annoying.

I particularly get annoyed at all of the archive footage with a modern commentator putting on a funny accent and made to sound like it was recorded at the time.

It simply doesn't sound real, and they use it very clumsily to try and insert some unrelated point (e.g how far he's come from working in a garage, that his wife is watching, etc.), or to try to create a forced narrative.

I think it would be much better to have a narrator.

Even the actual recordings from the archive footage have obviously been over processed and don't sound real at all.

I did enjoy many of the 60s and 70s archive clips - at least the visuals.

Reviewed by jeffdstockton 4 / 10

Not very good re F1, barely better re Jackie Stewart

If you view this because you're a fan of F1, you'll realize quickly that you can find better material elsewhere. If you want to learn about Jackie Stewart, this is barely OK, and there is just a little bit new. But, if you want a LOT of gratuitous screen time of Stewart's wife, you've come to the right place.

There is some new information about Jackie Stewart, but it could be better presented in about 20 minutes, instead of this dolorous plod through melodramatic muck. Also, a great deal of this material is taken from earlier documentaries, so is this done to bring it to a new audience, or is it done, ostensibly, to tell us something we didn't know before? The obvious answer is that it's done to sell programming while the subject might still capture enough interest to sell commercial time during it's broadcast. Ultimately, it's a lazy effort.

The movie-maker/ interviewer(s) insert themselves too often, obviously seeking to drive a narrative, spice things up, or allude to or imply something that otherwise isn't brought up by the subjects of the documentary.

This is, at best, a 20 minute documentary dragged out to....... FAR too long. And, the director, writer, producers managed to make it boring.

Reviewed by

Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment