Mythica: The Necromancer

2015

Action / Adventure / Fantasy

22
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 49%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 49% · 50 ratings
IMDb Rating 5.3/10 10 2679 2.7K

Plot summary

The young wizard Marek is forced to lead her band of would-be heroes on a mission for the corrupt Thieves Guild, which has taken her friend hostage. Their journey will take them straight into the wicked clutches of Szorlok, their greatest enemy.

Director

Top cast

Kevin Sorbo as Gojun Pye
Jake Stormoen as Dagen
Adam Johnson as Thane
Nicola Posener as Teela
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
874.55 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 35 min
Seeds 2
1.76 GB
1920*1072
English 5.1
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 35 min
Seeds 8

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by adaptor 6 / 10

It's a Mythica movie

I enjoy the Mythica movies. They're not great but they're fine and there aren't a lot of options for those of us that like fantasy stories. If you thought the first one was watchable, then I'd say watch the whole series since they're all roughly the same quality IMO.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by Brainpiercing 6 / 10

YES it's cheesy, it's low-budged (and sometimes looks it), but it's actually not that bad!

I'm not going too far out on a limb here saying, the Mythica series have always been like role playing sessions put into films. And... some here may disagree, but for me that's not a bad thing. Roleplaying adventures have always had their share of idiosyncrasies stemming from the genre - and they are all here: - a bogus motivation (BUT I credit the script writer that at least it wasn't a damsel in distress this time, but ironically the 'warrior') - a weird step-by-step quest - consecutive fights against hordes of useless bad guys - bogus drama - an encroaching super-powerful evil - a final battle against said super-powerful evil, that somehow ends with: - the critical level-up/deus-ex-machina solution.

HOWEVER, as a role-player - if not a currently active one - I find I repeatedly enjoyed myself, with this film and the other two, and more or less forgave these flaws. And I mind them less here than in a regular Hollywood (or other big budget cinema factory) flick that usually manages to add at least a few flaws of similar nature and proportion. (For instance the numerous flaws in the Hobbit trilogy bugged me far more, as those were made with - in comparison - unlimited money and access to talent.)

The production values present are of course not worthy of A-list cinema, and due to certain developments of big-budget TV-shows unfortunately not even A-list TV. But visuals are functional for the story, not bad enough to entirely distract, and I would say this third movie looked better than the two previous ones. CGI effects were bearable. Props and non-cgi effects were quite good. Fights were of course nothing special, but no worse than an episode of Arrow or other action oriented TV-show that relies on lots of guys standing around twitching before being beaten up one by one. The undoubtedly thousands of dollars invested into a few minutes of helicopter footage over different landscapes add a nice quality and tangibility to the world. Acting was... well... so-so, but then you can't expect too much. No worse than Orlando Bloom, anyway :P

What are the up-sides? The story is engaging enough. The characters have chemistry and reasonable development, and each get their cool moment. The GM-PC is a nice touch, an interesting guy, who unfortunately doesn't get developed enough, and finds a rather pointless end. Even though inconsistent and sometimes cheesy, I liked some of the spell effects. Also the "necromancy" effects on Marek's face are suitably dramatic. There is a nice build-up for the next film.

So: For me this film is a solid 6. And mind you this already includes IMDb rating creep. A 6 means it's very watchable if you like the genre. Flawed but watchable!

Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment