Cat Murkil and the Silks

1976

Action / Crime / Drama

2
IMDb Rating 4.7/10 10 193 193

Plot summary

A street-gang member kills the gang's leader and blames it on a rival gang.

Top cast

John Ashton as Coach Larkin
Don Carter as Bumps
Doug McGrath as Detective Lambert
Steve Bond as Joey Murkil
720p.BLU
948.82 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 43 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by gittes98

high school gangs -70s style

Saw this movie one hot August day in Seattle in '76. Was drawn by the lurid ad and the cheap matinee price. Instead of the chain wielding, snarling,figure on the one-sheet imagine how surprising it was to find out the lead actor was a skinny, blond-haired, blue-eyed pretty boy. The whole movie is clearly awful, the lead actor wouldn't cut muster in a high-school production and the others aren't much better including Steve Bond, latter of General Hospital and Canadian Doug McGrath of the classic Goin' Down the Road six years earlier. Understand that lead actor David Kyle became a missionary, a complete about-face from his role here.The movie was no better than the usual drive-in fare being produced at that time but at least it's storyline, about high school gangs was a little more 'meaty' than the usual teen hi-jinks comedies of the time. A guilty pleasure? Not really, but at least it may have been trying to convey something about high school violence and dysfunctional families. Or not.Incidently this movie was released on video under the title Cruisin' High which made it sound like either the typical teen hi-jinks comedy or set in a gay high school. Either way it was misleading since very little of the action takes place in a high school and the cruising involves gang rumbles.May hold some interest to those who love movies of the time and the differing attitudes of today.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by Retard-4 1 / 10

Dear God

This is without doubt one of the worst films I have ever seen. Almost everything about it is awful, especially the editing. This is no exaggeration. Watch something like Nosferatu, which was made in 1922, and then watch this, made over 50 years later and wonder why editing technology hasn't advanced in such a large period of time. The only thing this film is good for is that it's so bad you may have wet yourself by the end (which is crap, as if you had to be told). One of the worst films ever.

Read more IMDb reviews

No comments yet

Be the first to leave a comment